Showing posts with label best. Show all posts
Showing posts with label best. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

50 Best Apps and Websites for Travelers

There's an app for just about everything, from making the most of an extended flight delay to tapping into local culture. Here are the best digital tools for travelers, all tested by T+L's tech correspondent.

Everyone has an airport horror story. But you can make the most of a bad situation with apps like Flight+, which will keep you abreast of the latest delays and gate changes. And if you need a shower, unlimited Wi-Fi, or a work space during your extended layover, LoungeBuddy will alert you as to which free and pay-as-you-go lounges are available.
These are just two of the digital tools that can improve your experience on the road—among the 100,000-plus travel apps on the market. No need to feel overwhelmed, though. We spent the past year travel-testing apps and websites, everywhere from airplanes and buses to airport lounges, cars, and remote camping sites across the globe. The resulting list represents the best of the best, with runners-up in categories where the competition is fierce.
Google certainly makes an appearance, given the search giant's strengths in navigation (Google Maps), translation (Google Translate), photo management and storage (Google+), booking (Google Flight Search), and communication (Gmail and Google Hangouts).
Still, there are plenty of areas that shine brighter in other companies. RouteHappy's flight ratings guide you to the most stress-free flight; Booking.com's stellar customer service delivers an actual human on the other end of the help line; and Flickr offers a whopping 1 terabyte (TB) of free photo storage.
Read on for more innovative apps and websites that will help you every step of the way: planning your vacation, getting there, exploring, and sharing trip photos and stories after you return home.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Asus Zenfone 4 A400CG Review: Rounding Out the Family


Asus made quite a splash by launching three new phones this month, the Zenfone 4, Zenfone 5 and Zenfone 6. Despite the naming scheme, these are not the same device with different screen sizes. The sizes correspond to significant differences in price and capabilities.
Each of the three has its niche, and the Zenfone 4 is aimed squarely at capturing the bottom end of the smartphone market. Asus has its sights on first-time Android buyers who represent a massive opportunity for smartphone vendors.
There are two versions of the Zenfone 4 - the A400CG model which we have in for review today has a 4-inch screen and a 5-megapixel camera, whereas the A450CG, which hasn't launched here yet, has a 4.5-inch screen and 8-megapixel camera. Most other specifications are the same.
We were pretty impressed by the Zenfone 5 and Zenfone 6, which both provide excellent value at their price points. Now it's time to put the smallest sibling through our review process.

Look and feel
The Zenfone 4 is pretty small by today's standards, which means it's very easy to hold and use. It's very slightly shorter and wider than an iPhone 5, but quite a bit thicker. The bulging back in fact makes it more comfortable in the hand.
Our Zenfone 4 test unit came with a striking satiny blue rear panel, though black, white and red are also available. It's a high-quality finish, but we really wonder why Asus printed its own logo in red, right beneath the camera lens and speaker grille. There are also prominent white Intel Inside and Zenfone logos on the bottom rear.

The front is pretty consistent with the larger two Zenfones - there are three capacitive buttons below the screen and a speaker and camera above it. The lower lip and buttons have the distinct concentric circle texture that all Asus's Zen products have, but in this case it's all plastic and much less apparent.
The power and volume buttons are on the right edge, while the Micro-USB port is on the right and headset socket is on the top. There are two SIM card slots on the left edge, beneath the removable cover. The microSD card slot is to the left of the camera lens, right above the battery cavity. Unlike its bigger siblings, the Zenfone 4 has a removable battery.

Specifications and Software
With reduced prices come reduced specifications. The screen is a 4-inch 480x800-pixel panel which really isn't very bright and has poor viewing angles. The processor is a relatively low-end Intel Atom Z2520, which is a dual-core 1.2GHz model with Hyper-Threading and integrated PowerVR SGX544MP2 graphics. The 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage space are both on the higher side for phones in this price range, and will help keep things fresh and snappy for a while. You also get Wi-Fi b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0, A-GPS, an accelerometer and proximity sensor. The essentials are all accounted for, except maybe an ambient light sensor for automatic brightness control.
Asus ships the Zenfone 4 with Android 4.3, and there's quite a heavy skin on it called ZenUI. For the most part, we like Asus' work. The lock screen is clean and simple with all the required functionality - a big clock, weather information, notifications, alarm time, and shortcuts to the phone, messaging and camera apps. The shortcut icons also show the number of missed notifications, but strangely, you can't see who called or messaged.

You can have up to nine homescreens. Asus includes a widget called What's Next that shows upcoming appointments and important events. The app drawer has tabs which let you show only your downloaded or frequently used apps.
The notifications shade and quick settings panel are customised. They're both crisp and clear, which is all the more necessary on the Zenfone 4's low-resolution screen. You'll also see visual tweaks in the Settings, Messaging, Music, Email and other apps.

We weren't too happy with the default Asus keyboard - the layout is a bit odd with keys stacked perfectly in a grid rather than the more natural layout with each row offset - but there's no shortage of replacements in the Play store. Also, the decision to stick with capacitive buttons means you won't accidentally hit them while typing.
Asus includes a few interesting apps. SuperNote lets you create multi-page notes, on which you can type or sketch in multiple colours and styles. You can also embed photos, videos, audio clips, shape stamps and more. Do It Later is a reminders app that integrates with cloud services including Google and Exchange accounts. What's Next is the app counterpart of the homescreen widget of the same name.

The Splendid app lets you tweak screen parameters such as colour temperature and saturation. You can tweak each of the options by a few steps, but avoid the extremes (unless you want a monochrome screen, which is totally possible). The AudioWizard app only presents six audio EQ presets for different scenarios, including one for saving power. Share Link lets you easily set up a Wi-Fi Direct connection between two devices for file exchanges. Power Saver lets you define a custom profile or use a preset one to make the battery last longer.
Finally, there's the Kindle app, Movie Studio, Omlet Chat, Mirror, and of course assorted Google apps. Since most of the choices are actually quite useful, it doesn't feel like the Zenfone 4 comes with too much bloat.

Camera
Asus has packed quite a few filters and effects into its camera app. There are twelve modes to play with, including Time Rewind, Night, Selfie, Miniature, Smart Remove, All Smiles and GIF Animation. A Time Lapse mode is available when recording video. These work to varying degrees, but it takes quite a while to process some effects such as fake depth of field. There are also assorted filters which are applied before taking shots - Pencil, Cartoon, Lomo, Sepia, and more.
Party Link is a feature that uses Wi-Fi to sync photos between Asus phones as soon as they're taken. One person creates a group, and then others in the vicinity can join it. Other options you can adjust include image size, burst, anti-shake, face detection, auto focus mode, face detection, ISO, white balance and EV. It's a pretty broad range of capabilities for such an inexpensive device.

(Click to see full size)
Images measure only 2560x1440 (16:9) by default, but you can choose the larger 2560x1920 (4:3) if you prefer. Despite the low resolution, our test photos came out surprisingly sharp and clear. Other phones in this price range have fixed-focus lenses, but the Zenfone 4 has full autofocus and you can tap anywhere on the screen to change focus and metering. Close-up shots are far better than landscapes, but even so, the amount of detail in shots is remarkable. Even in low light, quality isn't bad at all - there's no flash, but we've seen far worse photos from phones which are twice as expensive or more. Even the front camera does an admirable job - another area in which budget phones typically don't do well at all.

(Click to see full size)
Video was also much better than we had expected. Full HD 1920x1080 clips look surprisingly good. They're definitely not crystal clear, but detail in things such as rustling leaves and curtains flapping in the wind is very good. These are videos that can be shown off and shared anywhere.

Performance
The Zenfone 4 might be cheap, but it's no slouch when it comes to performance. It managed to edge out the more expensive Motorola Moto E and Sony Xperia E1 Dual in pretty much every test. The score of 15,096 in AnTuTu was significantly better than the 12,546 and 13,200 points achieved by the Moto E and Xperia E1 respectively. Similarly, the Quadrant scores for all three phones were 6,395, 5,234 and 5,109 respectively.
Graphics scores were also higher - we recorded 16.4fps in GFXbench as opposed to 10.7 and 12.8 for the Moto E and Xperia E1 respectively. The three phones traded blows evenly in the more CPU-intensive SunSpider and Mozilla Kraken tests, though.
As far as subjective usage goes, we did find ourselves waiting for apps to load, but at least ZenUI transitions are quick and fluid. Basic games such as Temple Run were good enough - we wouldn't try anything heavier than that.

Battery life was also good, at 5 hours, 14 minutes in our video loop test. We would have liked to see a better score here, but it's at par with the competition. This should just about get you through a full day of calls, messages and a little bit of 3G Web usage. We had no complaints about call quality either, but were surprised to see an integrated option to record calls right in the phone app.
The built-in speaker is decently loud. Sound is thin, but it can get pretty loud and at least it doesn't distort. It came as a pleasant surprise that even our heaviest 1080p video sample played flawlessly on the Zenfone 4. However, as stated earlier, the phone's screen itself is pretty awful. We had to push the brightness up to its highest setting and even then, it wasn't always easy to see what was going on. Viewing angles are terrible and reflections on the glass make things that much worse.

Verdict
It seems that Asus is really on to something here - the Zenfone 4 is a fantastically capable device, considering its price. A lot of that has to do with the choice of an Intel processor - could the company finally be about to crack the mobile market, after struggling to do so for years?
The Zenfone 4's screen is pretty bad but nearly everything else is outstanding. We're particularly impressed with the device's camera capabilities. Full HD video recording is pretty neat, and it's nice to have a front camera - more so one that isn't terrible! We're looking forward to the A450CG revision which has a totally different screen and have high hopes that Asus will improve on this phone's one weakness.
It isn't hard at all to recommend the Zenfone 4. You can weigh your options between this phone, the Moto E and the Sony Xperia E1, but we think a lot of people who are shopping in this price range would be more than happy to save around Rs. 1,000-1,500.

The Moto G was Motorola's biggest selling handset of all time. With the Moto E, it's going even cheaper – but is this a cut too far?

2013's Moto G was arguably one of the most significant handsets ever produced by Motorola, and that's saying something when you consider just how long the company has been making mobile handsets. It is apparently the firm's best-selling smartphone of all time, and attained that status by providing fantastically capable tech with excellent software at a bargain price.
Does the Moto E compete? Or is it just a cut too far? Join us for our full review of the Moto E.

Motorola Moto E Review: Design & Display

At first glance you would be forgiven for assuming the Moto G and Moto E are identical; they both share a minimalist design, with a largely plain front and a matte-touch back panel which is rounded neatly so that it sits perfectly in the palm of your hand. Motorola has been subtle when it comes to embellishing the phone, too. The iconic "M" logo resides on the rear of the handset, but aside from that, there's little else in the way of innocuous branding. 
Upon closer inspection it becomes clear that the Moto E lacks some of the physical refinements of its slightly more expensive sibling. The build quality remains excellent, but it feels a little less robust than the Moto G. It's slightly chubbier too, despite the fact that in length and width, it's actually a smaller handset. 
There are some neat touches, however: the silver strips above and below the screen, which double up as grilles for the earpiece and speaker, conspire to break-up an otherwise monolithic frontage. While the back panel of the Moto E can be removed – just as was the case with the Moto G – the battery contained inside is not removable. It does support MicroSD cards, however. 
The Moto E's screen is one of the most obvious areas where Motorola has cut back costs. Here we have a 4.3-inch 960 x 540 pixel display, which is a step backwards from the 4.5-inch 720p screen we were greeted with on the Moto G. As a result, you'll notice that it's possible to pick out individual pixels on certain images, text especially. On the whole, however, the difference probably isn't as pronounced as you might imagine. The lower resolution also means that the phone's slightly weak CPU doesn't have as much heavy lifting to do, which is a bonus. 
Despite its bargain basement price, Motorola has ensured that the Moto E can withstand the usual everyday punishments we put our tech through. The screen is constructed of Corning Gorilla Glass 3, which is a super-tough material designed to withstand marks and scratches, as well as prevent unsightly smudging. We're happy to report that it performs its role admirably; compared to our Nexus 5, which has a screen that attracts greasy fingerprints with worrying regularity, the Moto E's display managed to remain almost entirely smudge-free during the review period.
The bodywork of the phone is also splash proof, which means you don't have to be too concerned about getting it wet when you're running for the bus on a rainy Monday morning. However, it doesn't offer the same protection as truly water-resistant phones, like the Galaxy S5 and LG G3, so don’t go getting in the shower or bath with it.

Motorola Moto E review: Software & User Experience 

One of the most appealing elements of the Moto G was the fact that it used stock Android, with only a smattering of exclusive apps to set it apart from the likes of the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5. Stock Android is generally faster and slicker than the UIs produced by the likes of Samsung and HTC, and this is because it hasn't been tinkered with in any way –– it's a "pure" version of Google's OS
Motorola has wisely maintained this stance with the Moto E, which is running Android 4.4.2 and will be getting an upgrade to the next version, Android L, once it becomes available later this year.

Motorola Moto E Review: Hardware & CPU

The Moto E is packing a 1.2GHz dual-core Snapdragon 200 processor backed by 1GB of RAM, and an Adreno 302 graphics processor. If that doesn't mean anything to you then take it from us, this isn't a cutting-edge handset. Even so, the overall performance isn't to be sniffed at. The Moto E may not offer the silky-smooth feel of the Nexus 5 or Galaxy S5, but it's still more than adequate for most users and not a million miles away from the experience provided by the Moto G, which is running a more powerful set of internal specifications.
Benchmark tests prove what we already know; the tech inside the Moto E isn't going to win any awards when set against the very best that Android has to offer. Running AnTuTu delivers a score of 12647, putting the Moto E well behind the likes of the HTC One M8, Samsung Galaxy S5 and LG G2. 
On Geekbench 3, the phone scores a 594 multi-core score, and a 322 single-core score – again, well below cutting-edge. Such figures sound damning on paper, but in reality the gulf isn't as pronounced as you might expect. 3D games naturally don't run as quickly or as smoothly, but every day usage is perfectly fine.

Motorola Moto E Review: Battery & Memory 

The Moto E comes with a 1920mAh battery, which can clearly be seen when you remove the back panel, but sadly cannot be accessed or removed. Motorola boasts that the phone is capable of lasting an entire day, and during our review this claim seemed to hold water.
We managed to get past that all-important 24-hour marker before a trip to the nearest wall socket was needed, but when we adopted a more aggressive usage pattern the stamina dropped massively. The Moto E may have a more modest CPU, but the fact that it's one of the older Snapdragon processors means that it's also not as economical with the juice and, therefore, won't last as long as its more expensive stable mate.
The Moto E comes with just 4GB of internal storage, of which you only have access to just over half – 2.16GB, to be precise. Needless to say, this fills up pretty quickly, so you'll want to invest in a Micro SD card as soon as possible. However, due to essential security changes in KitKat, external memory isn't the wild and free place it used to be on Android. Apps can only interact with folders they have created themselves on the SD card, so while you can create folders and add content using your PC, your apps won't be able to make changes within those folders due to Android's newfound security.
Translation: if you use a lot of apps you’re probably best of looking at a phone with more internal storage – 16GB and up-levels of storage, to be precise.

Motorola Moto E Review: Camera 

This is possibly the weakest point of the entire phone. The Moto E features a 5MP camera, but it's a fixed focus lens so you can't take close-up shots. There's also no LED flash.
While the auto HDR function does a good job of improving image quality, the overall performance of the Moto E's camera is rather poor when compared to most other Android phones. 
The fact that it's only when you use the Moto E as a photographic device that you're reminded of its low-cost origins says a lot about the general quality of this blower, but that doesn't make it any less disappointing. Photos are increasingly becoming a major part of our mobile experience thanks to apps like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, and there's a good chance that you'll be too embarrassed to come along to the party when you're armed with such a lacklustre snapper.
It's also worth noting that the Moto E lacks a front-facing camera, so you can't use the phone for Skype calls or any of that kind of jazz.

Motorola Moto E Review: Conclusion 

The Moto G completely redefined the concept of the budget smartphone, providing an experience that most people would have happily paid twice or maybe three times as much for. The Moto E is even cheaper, but in order to shave some cash off the RRP, Motorola has had to cut corners when it comes to screen size, CPU power and camera capability. 
Despite this, the Moto E remains an impressive phone that puts rival low-cost smartphones well and truly in the shade. If you're in the market for a device and price is your primary concern, then it makes sense to save the additional pennies and pick this over the Moto G, but if you can stretch the cost then Motorola's 2013 offering is a cannier purchase. .